Microsummary: Philosemitic vs. Libertarian World History

From Eternal Victims to Statist Warmongers

Introduction

Historians are perhaps the most politically correct scholars, for a simple reason: otherwise they would not be historians. After all, it is the victors who write—or rather dictate—how history is written. In the West, as Jews gradually became the dominant minority, they ensured that only a philosemitic interpretation of history would be produced by scholars, taught in schools, and propagated in the media. This has profoundly shaped both the theory and narrative of history.

Philosemitic Narrative

Philosemitism has influenced historical theory by promoting relativist methodologies, then applying double standards to demonize so-called “antisemitic” groups—particularly White Christian conservative men. World history is framed as a sequence of tyrannical, antisemitic White nations and religions: the Roman Empire, conquering Crusaders, the intolerant Catholic Church, the Spanish Inquisition, Russian pogroms, German Nazism and Anglo elitism.

Jews are portrayed as heroic, persecuted and discriminated victims who survived through perseverance and intelligence—supporting philosemitic medieval rulers, then Protestant countries, and especially the Anglo-American empire that became the hegemonic power it remains today. In this view, Jews aided “good” rulers such as Charlemagne, Saladin, William III, Victoria, Churchill, Roosevelt.

In academia and media Israel and America are now portrayed as a force for democracy and freedom that fight against the evil Iranians, Chinese and Russians.

Libertarian Narrative

From a libertarian perspective, the narrative of world history is precisely the opposite to philosemitic one. After the fall of the Roman Empire, competing jurisdictions fostered the European Miracle of freedom and prosperity. Unfortunately, the Jewish elite halted this decentralizing process by financially, organizationally and personally supporting many kings against the more decentralist aristocrats, emperors and the Pope, giving birth to the first medieval centralized warfare states with standing armies.

Statism escalated further when Jews backed the breakup of the decentralized, anti-statist Catholic Church, leading to the Wars of Religion. The battle between Catholics and Protestants ended in the stalemate Peace of Westphalia in 1648. But then the Jews helped escalate statism in a crucial way by financing the British “Glorious Revolution,” which enabled the creation of a new money machine: fractional-reserve central banking in 1694.

The final escalation came when the Jewish elite supported the two great statist-centralizing revolutions: the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789. These paved the way for fake ballot-box democracy and Anglo-American hegemony, which enabled the rise of the Jewish dominant minority.

The Jewish elite has used its power to invert rationalist Western culture into woke relativism and created inflationist central banks that finance the globalist welfare-warfare state—now pushing the world toward nuclear war to defend the imperialist and genocidal state of Israel.

Conclusion

World history is a battle between liberty and statism. Unfortunately, the Jewish elite allied with the state and helped statism prevail. Today, the Jewish elite is the warmongering dominant minority in the West more clearly than ever—yet paradoxically, historians remain more silent than ever.